Your donations help us continue to add new and exciting features. Please consider making a donation
OrthodoxBluesApr 22, 2010 6:55 AM GMT
I have a good friend who plays harp who just adores crystal elements. I like them well enough, but the Shure controlled magnetic (CM) and controlled reluctance (CR) are my favorite elements by far. I like the gritty flavor of a ceramic element, and other dynamic types. I also have some newer cleaner mics that sound great for jazz. I know that some players use clean mics and add overdrive with pedals or the amp. For blues, I haven't found anything that sounds as perfect to me as one of my old Shure CM or CR mics.
What do you like?
Order by DateAscendingDescending
Hi, I like ASTATIC MC-151 and Shure controlled magnetic (CM) .
There are good for HARPGEAR2 and FENDER CHAMPION 600, GUYATONE HP-300A.
As much as I love the sure CR element in my strange old aussie dynamike, I find I am using my 'Loud Bark' microphone more for live now. It has a dynamic element in it, but it is not what I would call clean at all. It is a smallish wooden bullet shape mic made here in Australia and is supposed to be very feedback resistant. And it is. The pitch according to the maker is that the wood fibers somehow soak up the frequencies that would feedback. I think it is more to do with it often being run into amps without an impedence transformer. Then again I use a transformer and it is still pretty feedback resistant. It sounds quite good and loud with my tube pre-amp into my Keyboard amp. Sorry if off topic a butit is an interesting mic. Here is a link
http://loudbark.net/ I do not play anywhere as hard as the demo and it sounds alright.
CR and CM for me!
Harpman, when do you use the crystal MC-151 and when the CM? Does it depend on the song or the amp or something else?
Chris, is the sound of the Loudbark actually dirtier than a CM? I don't think that talking about that mic is off-topic at all!
Joe, do you prefer CM over CR or vice versa?
Drew, The loud bark is not as bright as the Dynamike. The Dynamike has a lovely complex mid tone (with a after palet of chocholate and strawberrys) but is more problematic with feedback. The loud bark is aless livelydirty tone but quite acceptible. Very suprizing for a dynamic mic.
Okay, if I understand you, the Dynamike has a Shure CR in it, and I think that you prefer its tone over the Loud Bark, but the Loud Bark is close, and gets the nod for live work because it is far more resistant to feedback?